ScienceBasedKids.com may earn a commission from affiliate links in this review. Our ratings are never influenced by affiliate relationships. Read our full methodology.

The box arrives with the weight of a promise. Inside, nestled in recycled packaging with a minimalist play guide, are five or six toys designed — Lovevery assures you — by “a team of child development experts” to support your baby’s exact developmental stage. It’s $80 per kit, delivered every two to three months. The unboxing videos on Instagram have millions of views. The question every sleep-deprived parent quietly wonders: is this actually doing something special for my baby, or is it beautifully packaged peace of mind?

We evaluated “The Explorer” play kit (months 7-8) against Lovevery’s specific developmental claims, comparable products at lower price points, and the peer-reviewed research Lovevery cites in its own materials. The answer is more nuanced than either the fans or the skeptics suggest.

Product Overview

“The Explorer” kit is designed for babies in months 7 and 8, a stage characterized by emerging mobility, increased object permanence awareness, and growing intentionality in reaching and grasping. The kit includes:

• Sliding Top Box — A wooden box with a sliding lid, designed for object permanence exploration
• Ball Drop — A wooden ball that drops into a cup, demonstrating cause and effect
• Texture Cards — High-contrast cards with tactile elements
• Standing Card Holder — A wooden holder for the texture cards
• Felt Ball — A soft, graspable ball for rolling and reaching
• Play Guide — A booklet explaining the developmental rationale for each toy, with activity suggestions and milestone information

All items are made from sustainably sourced wood, organic cotton, or baby-safe silicone. The production quality is immediately apparent — these feel like heirloom pieces, not disposable plastic. The packaging itself is designed for play (the box becomes a hiding game).

Lovevery offers its kits as a subscription ($80/kit, shipped every 2-3 months) or as individual purchases ($84/kit). Over the first two years, the total subscription cost runs approximately $480.

Our Evaluation

Build Quality: 9/10

This is where Lovevery genuinely excels. Every piece in the kit feels intentional. The wooden items are smooth, with rounded edges and finishes that have held up across multiple babies in our testing network. The paint is non-toxic and doesn’t chip under vigorous mouthing (and vigorous mouthing is the primary activity at 7 months). The felt ball is well-constructed with reinforced seams.

The materials are a clear step above most mass-market infant toys. Where a comparable Fisher-Price item might use injection-molded plastic, Lovevery uses FSC-certified beechwood. This is both an aesthetic and a practical choice — wood is more durable than plastic in many applications and doesn’t develop the sticky residue that plagues older plastic toys.

Play Value: 7/10

The items in “The Explorer” are well-suited to the 7-8 month developmental window. The Sliding Top Box was the clear favorite in our testing — babies at this age are fascinated by disappearing objects, and the simple mechanism of sliding a lid to reveal a hidden ball produced repeated delight. The Ball Drop similarly held attention through multiple sessions.

The Texture Cards received mixed engagement. Some babies found them interesting; others preferred to chew on them rather than explore the textures, which is developmentally appropriate but not quite the “sensory exploration” Lovevery envisions. The Felt Ball was pleasant but unremarkable — there’s nothing wrong with it, but it’s a felt ball.

The play guide adds genuine value. It’s well-written, specific, and gives parents concrete activities to try. For first-time parents, this contextual guidance can reduce the “what do I do with my baby” anxiety that drives a lot of these purchases.

However — and this is the key tension — most of these play experiences can be replicated with household items. A pot with a lid and a ball inside provides the same object permanence exploration as the Sliding Top Box. A crinkly piece of fabric provides similar sensory input to the Texture Cards. You’re paying for the curation, the aesthetic, and the developmental framing — not for play experiences that are otherwise inaccessible.

Age Appropriateness: 8/10

The kit is well-targeted for its stated age range. Each item maps to a real developmental milestone typical of months 7-8: emerging object permanence, cause-and-effect understanding, reaching and grasping with intentionality, and tactile exploration. Lovevery’s development team clearly understands the sequence of infant milestones, and the kit’s contents reflect genuine expertise in this area.

The caveat is that babies develop on their own timelines. We observed that some 7-month-olds weren’t yet interested in the Sliding Top Box (the motor coordination to slide the lid wasn’t quite there), while some 6-month-olds could have engaged with it. The bimonthly delivery cadence is a reasonable approximation, but it’s still an approximation.

Durability: 8/10

The wooden items are essentially indestructible under normal baby use. The Felt Ball showed some pilling after repeated machine washing but maintained its structural integrity. The Texture Cards are the weakest element — the tactile elements (fabric, rubber dots) can detach under sustained mouthing, which is a concern given that mouthing is the primary interaction mode at this age. We’d like to see more robust attachment on these.

Value for Money: 5/10

Here’s where we apply the critical lens. At $80, “The Explorer” contains perhaps $25-30 worth of materials by any reasonable manufacturing cost estimate. The wooden items are well-made but simple — a sliding box, a ball drop cup, a card holder. The felt ball and texture cards round out the kit but aren’t premium items.

What you’re paying for is the curation service: someone with developmental expertise has selected appropriate items, timed the delivery to your baby’s age, and provided a contextual guide. That curation has real value, particularly for first-time parents navigating the overwhelming infant toy market.

But let’s be specific. The Hape “Pound & Tap Bench” ($20) provides comparable cause-and-effect play. A set of Sassy brand texture cards ($8) offers similar sensory exploration. A good wooden stacking toy ($15) covers object manipulation. You could replicate the core play experiences in this kit for $40-50 with individually purchased items — though you’d lose the curated developmental arc and the premium aesthetics.

For families where $80 is a meaningful expense, the calculus doesn’t quite work. For families where it’s discretionary, the convenience and quality justify the premium.

The Evidence

Lovevery’s marketing is built on a “science-backed” identity. Their website references “research from MIT, Stanford, and Montessori” and states that each toy is “designed around developmental milestones rooted in decades of research.” Let’s evaluate these claims for “The Explorer” specifically.

Object Permanence (Sliding Top Box, Ball Drop). Object permanence — understanding that objects continue to exist when out of sight — is a well-established developmental milestone first described by Piaget (1954).¹ The typical emergence at 7-8 months is well-documented. Baillargeon (1987) demonstrated through innovative looking-time experiments that infants may have earlier-than-Piaget-suggested awareness of hidden objects.²

What the research supports: babies at this age are developing object permanence, and playing hiding games is a natural, appropriate activity. What the research does not support: that a specific wooden box with a sliding lid develops object permanence faster or better than any other hiding game. A blanket draped over a rattle provides the same cognitive challenge. Lovevery’s product is a well-designed delivery mechanism for a play experience, not a developmental accelerator.

Sensory Exploration (Texture Cards). The claim that tactile exploration supports sensory development is broadly supported by developmental neuroscience. Cascio (2010) reviewed the development of somatosensory processing and found that varied tactile experience contributes to sensory discrimination ability.³ However, the research describes sensory development as emerging from the totality of an infant’s tactile environment — crawling on carpet, mouthing objects, being held — not from specific “sensory toys.”

Cause and Effect (Ball Drop). Understanding causality develops gradually in the first year. Saxe and Carey (2006) found that infants as young as 10 months can reason about cause-and-effect relationships.⁴ Simple cause-and-effect toys (drop a ball, it appears somewhere) are developmentally appropriate but not uniquely beneficial. Banging a spoon on a high chair tray teaches cause and effect just as effectively.

The honest summary: Lovevery’s developmental framing is directionally correct. They understand child development, and their toys align with real milestones. But their marketing implies a specificity of benefit that the research doesn’t support. The phrase “science-backed” suggests that research shows these particular toys produce developmental benefits — in reality, the research shows that the types of play these toys facilitate are developmentally appropriate. The distinction matters, especially at this price point. Playing with your baby is what’s developmental. The specific objects are secondary.

Safety Notes

The Explorer kit meets CPSC and ASTM F963 safety requirements for infant toys. All materials are tested for lead, phthalates, and other harmful substances. The wooden items use water-based, non-toxic finishes. No CPSC recalls have been issued for any Lovevery product.

One consideration: the Texture Cards’ small tactile elements should be monitored for detachment, particularly as the cards age. While the elements are designed to be securely attached, persistent mouthing and pulling can weaken adhesion over time. Regular inspection is advisable.

The wooden ball included in the Ball Drop set is sized above the small-parts threshold but should still be used under supervision, as with all infant toys.

The Verdict

Lovevery’s “The Explorer” kit is a well-designed, beautifully made collection of infant toys that are developmentally appropriate for the 7-8 month window. The build quality is excellent, the play guide is genuinely helpful, and the curation saves parents real time and decision fatigue. Lovevery’s developmental team clearly knows their stuff.

Where we part ways with the marketing is on the implied causality. Lovevery’s toys don’t create developmental outcomes — they provide attractive, appropriate contexts for play that would happen anyway with any reasonable set of objects and an engaged caregiver. The science supports playing with your baby. It doesn’t specifically support paying $80 for a curated box to do it with.

That said, there’s nothing wrong with choosing beautiful, well-made things for your baby. If the kit sparks more intentional play and gives you confidence as a parent, that has real value even if it can’t be cited in a journal.

Product Rating: 7/10 — A high-quality product with real curation value, held back by the gap between its price and its unique developmental contribution.

Evidence Rating: Emerging — Developmental claims are directionally correct but overstate the specificity of benefit. The research supports the types of play, not the specific products.

Who Should Buy This

• First-time parents who value expert curation and want guidance on age-appropriate play
• Families who appreciate premium, sustainably made baby products
• Gift-givers looking for a thoughtful, well-presented baby gift
• Parents who find the infant toy market overwhelming and want a trusted “just tell me what to buy” option

Who Should Skip This

• Budget-conscious families (you can replicate the core play experiences for less)
• Parents on their second or third child who already have a sense of what’s age-appropriate
• Anyone who primarily values the “science-backed” framing — the science supports the play, not the price tag
• Families who already have a well-stocked collection of basic infant toys

---

This review reflects our independent evaluation. ScienceBasedKids.com purchased this product at retail price. We may earn a commission if you purchase through our links, which helps fund our research. This never influences our ratings.

Footnotes

1. Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books. ↩

2. Baillargeon, R. (1987). “Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants.” Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 655-664. ↩

3. Cascio, C. J. (2010). “Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders.” Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(2), 62-69. ↩

4. Saxe, R., & Carey, S. (2006). “The perception of causality in infancy.” Acta Psychologica, 123(1-2), 144-165. ↩